It is furthermore remarkable that though the two stories are distinct--my own, as it were, and this other--they equally began, in a manner, the first night of my acquaintance with Frank Saltram, the night I came back from Wimbledon so agitated with a new sense of life that, in London, for the very thrill of it, I could only walk home.Walking and swinging my stick, I overtook, at Buckingham Gate, George Gravener, and George Gravener's story may be said to have begun with my ****** him, as our paths lay together, come home with me for a talk.I duly remember, let me parenthesise, that it was still more that of another person, and also that several years were to elapse before it was to extend to a second chapter.I had much to say to him, none the less, about my visit to the Mulvilles, whom he more indifferently knew, and I was at any rate so amusing that for long afterwards he never encountered me without asking for news of the old man of the sea.
I hadn't said Mr.Saltram was old, and it was to be seen that he was of an age to outweather George Gravener.I had at that time a lodging in Ebury Street, and Gravener was staying at his brother's empty house in Eaton Square.At Cambridge, five years before, even in our devastating set, his intellectual power had seemed to me almost awful.Some one had once asked me privately, with blanched cheeks, what it was then that after all such a mind as that left standing."It leaves itself!" I could recollect devoutly replying.
I could smile at present for this remembrance, since before we got to Ebury Street I was struck with the fact that, save in the sense of being well set up on his legs, George Gravener had actually ceased to tower.The universe he laid low had somehow bloomed again--the usual eminences were visible.I wondered whether he had lost his humour, or only, dreadful thought, had never had any--not even when I had fancied him most Aristophanesque.What was the need of appealing to laughter, however, I could enviously enquire, where you might appeal so confidently to measurement? Mr.
Saltram's queer figure, his thick nose and hanging lip, were fresh to me: in the light of my old friend's fine cold symmetry they presented mere success in amusing as the refuge of conscious ugliness.Already, at hungry twenty-six, Gravener looked as blank and parliamentary as if he were fifty and popular.In my scrap of a residence--he had a worldling's eye for its futile conveniences, but never a comrade's joke--I sounded Frank Saltram in his ears; a circumstance I mention in order to note that even then I was surprised at his impatience of my enlivenment.As he had never before heard of the personage it took indeed the form of impatience of the preposterous Mulvilles, his relation to whom, like mine, had had its origin in an early, a childish intimacy with the young Adelaide, the fruit of multiplied ties in the previous generation.
When she married Kent Mulville, who was older than Gravener and Iand much more amiable, I gained a friend, but Gravener practically lost one.We reacted in different ways from the form taken by what he called their deplorable social action--the form (the term was also his) of nasty second-rate gush.I may have held in my 'for interieur' that the good people at Wimbledon were beautiful fools, but when he sniffed at them I couldn't help taking the opposite line, for I already felt that even should we happen to agree it would always be for reasons that differed.It came home to me that he was admirably British as, without so much as a sociable sneer at my bookbinder, he turned away from the serried rows of my little French library.
"Of course I've never seen the fellow, but it's clear enough he's a humbug.""Clear 'enough' is just what it isn't," I replied; "if it only were!" That ejaculation on my part must have been the beginning of what was to be later a long ache for final frivolous rest.
Gravener was profound enough to remark after a moment that in the first place he couldn't be anything but a Dissenter, and when Ianswered that the very note of his fascination was his extraordinary speculative breadth my friend retorted that there was no cad like your cultivated cad, and that I might depend upon discovering--since I had had the levity not already to have enquired--that my shining light proceeded, a generation back, from a Methodist cheesemonger.I confess I was struck with his insistence, and I said, after reflexion: "It may be--I admit it may be; but why on earth are you so sure?"--asking the question mainly to lay him the trap of saying that it was because the poor man didn't dress for dinner.He took an instant to circumvent my trap and come blandly out the other side.