Nothing could indeed be more rude and careless than the structure of his narrative poems.He seems to have thought, with the hero of the Rehearsal, that the plot was good for nothing but to bring in fine things.His two longest works, Childe Harold and Don Juan, have no plan whatever.Either of them might have been extended to any length, or cut short at any point.The state in which the Giaour appears illustrates the manner in which all Byron's poems were constructed.They are all, like the Giaour, collections of fragments; and, though there may be no empty spaces marked by asterisks, it is still easy to perceive, by the clumsiness of the joining, where the parts for the sake of which the whole was composed end and begin.
It was in description and meditation that Byron excelled.
"Description," as he said in Don Juan, "was his forte." His manner is indeed peculiar, and is almost unequalled; rapid, sketchy, full of vigour; the selection happy, the strokes few and bold.In spite of the reverence which we feel for the genius of Mr.Wordsworth we cannot but think that the minuteness of his descriptions often diminishes their effect.He has accustomed himself to gaze on nature with the eye of a lover, to dwell on every feature, and to mark every change of aspect.Those beauties which strike the most negligent observer, and those which only a close attention discovers, are equally familiar to him and are equally prominent in his poetry.The proverb of old Hesiod, that half is often more than the whole, is eminently applicable to description.The policy of the Dutch, who cut down most of the precious trees in the Spice Islands, in order to raise the value of what remained, was a policy which poets would do well to imitate.It was a policy which no poet understood better than Lord Byron.Whatever his faults might be, he was never, while his mind retained its vigour, accused of prolixity.
His descriptions, great as was their intrinsic merit, derived.
their principal interest from the feeling which always mingled with them.He was himself the beginning, the middle, and the end, of all his own poetry, the hero of every tale, the chief object in every landscape.Harold, Lara, Manfred, and a crowd of other characters, were universally considered merely as loose incognitos of Byron; and there is every reason to believe that he meant them to be so considered.The wonders of the outer world, the Tagus, with the mighty fleets of England riding on its bosom, the towers of Cintra overhanging the shaggy forest of cork-trees and willows, the glaring marble of Pentelicus, the banks of the Rhine, the glaciers of Clarens, the sweet Lake of Leman, the dell of Egeria with its summer-birds and rustling lizards, the shapeless ruins of Rome overgrown with ivy and wall-flowers, the, stars, the sea, the mountains, all were mere accessories, the background to one dark and melancholy figure.
Never had any writer so vast a command of the whole eloquence of scorn, misanthropy, and despair.That Marah was never dry.No art could sweeten, no draughts could exhaust, its perennial waters of bitterness.Never was there such variety in monotony as that of Byron.From maniac laughter to piercing lamentation, there was not a single note of human anguish of which he was not master.
Year after year, and month after month, he continued to repeat that to be wretched is the destiny of all; that to be eminently wretched is the destiny of the eminent; that all the desires by which we are cursed lead alike to misery, if they are not gratified, to the misery of disappointment; if they are gratified, to the misery of satiety.His heroes are men who have arrived by different roads at the same goal of despair, who are sick of life, who are at war with society, who are supported in their anguish only by an unconquerable pride resembling that of Prometheus on the rock or of Satan in the burning marl, who can master their agonies by the force of their will, and who to the last defy the whole power of earth and heaven.He always described himself as a man of the same kind with his favourite creations, as a man whose heart had been withered, whose capacity for happiness was gone and could not be restored, but whose invincible spirit dared the worst that could befall him here or hereafter.
How much of this morbid feeling sprang from an original disease of the mind, how much from real misfortune, how much from the nervousness of dissipation, how much was fanciful, how much was merely affected, it is impossible for us, and would probably have been impossible for the most intimate friends of Lord Byron, to decide.Whether there ever existed, or can ever exist, a person answering to the description which he gave of himself may be doubted; but that he was not such a person is beyond all doubt.