At length he found that, while he was trying to prop the fortunes of another, he was in danger of shaking his own.He had disobliged both the parties whom he wished to reconcile.Essex thought him wanting in zeal as a friend: Elizabeth thought him wanting in duty as a subject.The Earl looked on him as a spy of the Queen; the Queen as a creature of the Earl.The reconciliation which he had laboured to effect appeared utterly hopeless.A thousand signs, legible to eyes far less keen than his, announced that the fall of his patron was at hand.He shaped his course accordingly.When Essex was brought before the council to answer for his conduct in Ireland, Bacon, after a faint attempt to excuse himself from taking part against his friend, submitted himself to the Queen's pleasure, and appeared at the bar in support of the charges.But a darker scene was behind.The unhappy young nobleman, made reckless by despair ventured on a rash and criminal enterprise, which rendered him liable to the highest penalties of the law.What course was Bacon to take? This was one of those conjunctures which show what men are.To a high-minded man, wealth, power, court-favour, even personal safety, would have appeared of no account, when opposed to friendship, gratitude, and honour.Such a man would have stood by the side of Essex at the trial, would have "spent all his power, might, authority, and amity" in soliciting a mitigation of the sentence, would have been a daily visitor at the cell, would have received the last injunctions and the last embrace on the scaffold, would have employed all the powers of his intellect to guard from insult the fame of his generous though erring friend.An ordinary man would neither have incurred the danger of succouring Essex, nor the disgrace of assailing him.Bacon did not even preserve neutrality.He appeared as counsel for the prosecution.In that situation, he did not confine himself to what would have been amply sufficient to procure a verdict.He employed all his wit, his rhetoric, and his learning, not to ensure a conviction,--for the circumstances were such that a conviction was inevitable,--but to deprive the unhappy prisoner of all those excuses which, though legally of no value, yet tended to diminish the moral guilt of the crime, and which, therefore, though they could not justify the peers in pronouncing an acquittal, might incline the Queen to grant a pardon.The Earl urged as a palliation of his frantic acts that he was surrounded by powerful and inveterate enemies, that they had ruined his fortunes, that they sought his life, and that their persecutions had driven him to despair.This was true; and Bacon well knew it to be true.But he affected to treat it as an idle pretence.He compared Essex to Pisistratus, who, by pretending to be in imminent danger of assassination, and by exhibiting self-inflicted wounds, succeeded in establishing tyranny at Athens.This was too much for the prisoner to bear.He interrupted his ungrateful friend by calling on him to quit the part of an advocate, to come forward as a witness, and to tell the Lords whether, in old times, he, Francis Bacon, had not, under his own hand, repeatedly asserted the truth of what he now represented as idle pretexts.It is painful to go on with this lamentable story.Bacon returned a shuffling answer to the Earl's question, and, as if the allusion to Pisistratus were not sufficiently offensive, made another allusion still more unjustifiable.He compared Essex to Henry Duke of Guise, and the rash attempt in the city to the day of the barricades at Paris.
Why Bacon had recourse to such a topic it is difficult to say, It was quite unnecessary for the purpose of obtaining a verdict.It was certain to produce a strong impression on the mind of the haughty and jealous princess on whose pleasure the Earl's fate depended.The faintest allusion to the degrading tutelage in which the last Valois had been held by the House of Lorraine was sufficient to harden her heart against a man who in rank, in military reputation, in popularity among the citizens of the capital, bore some resemblance to the Captain of the League.
Essex was convicted.Bacon made no effort to save him, though the Queen's feelings were such that he might have pleaded his benefactor's cause, possibly with success, certainly without any serious danger to himself.The unhappy nobleman was executed.His fate excited strong, perhaps unreasonable feelings of compassion and indignation.The Queen was received by the citizens of London with gloomy looks and faint acclamations.She thought it expedient to publish a vindication of her late proceedings.The faithless friend who had assisted in taking the Earl's life was now employed to murder the Earl's fame.The Queen had seen some of Bacon's writings, and had been pleased with them.He was accordingly selected to write A Declaration of the Practices and Treasons attempted and committed by Robert Earl of Essex, which was printed by authority.In the succeeding reign, Bacon had not a word to say in defence of this performance, a performance abounding in expressions which no generous enemy would have employed respecting a man who had so dearly expiated his offences.His only excuse was, that he wrote it by command, that he considered himself as a mere secretary, that he had particular instructions as to the way in which he was to treat every part of the subject, and that, in fact, he had furnished only the arrangement and the style.
We regret to say that the whole conduct of Bacon through the course of these transactions appears to Mr.Montagu not merely excusable, but deserving of high admiration.The integrity and benevolence of this gentleman are so well known that our readers will probably be at a loss to conceive by what steps he can have arrived at so extraordinary a conclusion: and we are half afraid that they will suspect us of practising some artifice upon them when we report the principal arguments which he employs.