He was now satisfied that he had little to hope from the patronage of those powerful kinsmen whom he had solicited during twelve years with such meek pertinacity; and he began to look towards a different quarter.Among the courtiers of Elizabeth had lately appeared a new favourite, young, noble, wealthy, accomplished, eloquent brave, generous, aspiring; a favourite who had obtained from the grey-headed Queen such marks of regard as she had scarce vouchsafed to Leicester in the season of the passions; who was at once the ornament of the palace and the idol of the city.who was the common patron of men of letters and of men of the sword; who was the common refuge of the persecuted Catholic and of the persecuted Puritan.The calm prudence which had enabled Burleigh to shape his course through so many dangers, and the vast experience which he had acquired in dealing with two generations of colleagues and rivals, seemed scarcely sufficient to support him in this new competition; and Robert Cecil sickened with fear and envy as he contemplated the rising fame and influence of Essex.
The history of the factions which, towards the close of the reign of Elizabeth, divided her court and her council, though pregnant with instruction, is by no means interesting or pleasing.Both parties employed the means which are familiar to unscrupulous statesmen; and neither had, or even pretended to have, any important end in view.The public mind was then reposing from one great effort, and collecting strength for another.That impetuous and appalling rush with which the human intellect had moved forward in the career of truth and liberty, during the fifty years which followed the separation of Luther from the communion of the Church of Rome, was now over.The boundary between Protestantism and Popery had been fixed very nearly where it still remains.England, Scotland, the Northern kingdoms were on one side; Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Italy, on the other.The line of demarcation ran, as it still runs, through the midst of the Netherlands, of Germany, and of Switzerland, dividing province from province, electorate from electorate, and canton from canton.France might be considered as a debatable land, in which the contest was still undecided.Since that time, the two religions have done little more than maintain their ground.A few occasional incursions have been made.But the general frontier remains the same.During two hundred and fifty years no great society has risen up like one man, and emancipated itself by one mighty effort from the superstition of ages.This spectacle was common in the sixteenth century.Why has it ceased to be so? Why has so violent a movement been followed by so long a repose? The doctrines of the Reformers are not less agreeable to reason or to revelation now than formerly.The public mind is assuredly not less enlightened now than formerly.Why is it that Protestantism, after carrying everything before it in a time of comparatively little knowledge and little *******, should make no perceptible progress in a reasoning and tolerant age; that the Luthers, the Calvins, the Knoxes, the Zwingles, should have left no successors; that during two centuries and a half fewer converts should have been brought over from the Church of Rome than at the time of the Reformation were sometimes gained in a year? This has always appeared to us one of the most curious and interesting problems in history.On some future occasion we may perhaps attempt to solve it.At present it is enough to say that, at the close of Elizabeth's reign, the Protestant party, to borrow the language of the Apocalypse, had left its first love and had ceased to do its first works.
The great struggle of the sixteenth century was over.The great struggle of the seventeenth century had not commenced.The confessors of Mary's reign were dead.The members of the Long Parliament were still in their cradles.The Papists had been deprived of all power in the State.The Puritans had not yet attained any formidable extent of power.True it is that a student, well acquainted with the history of the next generation, can easily discern in the proceedings of the last Parliaments of Elizabeth the germ of great and ever memorable events.But to the eye of a contemporary nothing of this appeared.The two sections of ambitious men who were struggling for power differed from each other on no important public question.Both belonged to the Established Church.Both professed boundless loyalty to the Queen.Both approved the war with Spain.There is not, as far as we are aware, any reason to believe that they entertained different views concerning the succession to the Crown.Certainly neither faction had any great measure of reform in view.Neither attempted to redress any public grievance.The most odious and pernicious grievance under which the nation then suffered was a source of profit to both, and was defended by both with equal zeal.Raleigh held a monopoly of cards, Essex a monopoly of sweet wines.In fact, the only ground of quarrel between the parties was that they could not agree as to their respective shares of power and patronage.