The ties of party superseded the ties of neighbourhood and of blood.The members of the hostile factions would scarcely speak to each other, or bow to each other.The women appeared at the theatres bearing the badges of their political sect.The schism extended to the most remote counties of England.Talents, such as had seldom before been displayed in political controversy, were enlisted in the service of the hostile parties.On one side was Steele, gay, lively, drunk with animal spirits and with factious animosity, and Addison, with his polished satire, his inexhaustible fertility of fancy, and his graceful simplicity of style.In the front of the opposite ranks appeared a darker and fiercer spirit, the apostate politician, the ribald priest, the perjured lover, a heart burning with hatred against the whole human race, a mind richly stored with images from the dung-hill and the lazar-house.The ministers triumphed, and the peace was concluded.Then came the reaction.A new sovereign ascended the throne.The Whigs enjoyed the confidence of the King and of the Parliament.The unjust severity with which the Tories had treated Marlborough and Walpole was more than retaliated.Harley and Prior were thrown into prison; Bolingbroke and Ormond were compelled to take refuge in a foreign land.The wounds inflicted in this desperate conflict continued to rankle for many years.It was long before the members of either party could discuss the question of the peace of Utrecht with calmness and impartiality.
That the Whig ministers had sold us to the Dutch; that the Tory ministers had sold us to the French; that the war had been carried on only to fill the pockets of Marlborough; that the peace had been concluded only to facilitate the return of the Pretender; these imputations and many others, utterly ungrounded, or grossly exaggerated, were hurled backward and forward by the political disputants of the last century.In our time the question may be discussed without irritation.We will state, as concisely as possible, the reasons which have led us to the conclusion at which we have arrived.
The dangers which were to be apprehended from the peace were two;first, the danger that Philip might be induced, by feelings of private affection, to act in strict concert with the elder branch of his house, to favour the French trade at the expense of England, and to side with the French Government in future wars;secondly, the danger that the posterity of the Duke of Burgundy might become extinct, that Philip might become heir by blood to the French crown, and that thus two great monarchies might be united under one sovereign.
The first danger appears to us altogether chimerical.Family affection has seldom produced much effect on the policy of princes.The state of Europe at the time of the peace of Utrecht proved that in politics the ties of interest are much stronger than those of consanguinity or affinity.The Elector of Bavaria had been driven from his dominions by his father-in-law; Victor Amadeus was in arms against his sons-in-law; Anne was seated on a throne from which she had assisted to push a most indulgent father.It is true that Philip had been accustomed from childhood to regard his grandfather with profound veneration.It was probable, therefore, that the influence of Lewis at Madrid would be very great.But Lewis was more than seventy years old; he could not live long; his heir was an infant in the cradle.There was surely no reason to think that the policy of the King of Spain would be swayed by his regard for a nephew whom he had never seen.
In fact, soon after the peace, the two branches of the House of Bourbon began to quarrel.A close alliance was formed between Philip and Charles, lately competitors for the Castilian crown.ASpanish princess, betrothed to the King of France, was sent back in the most insulting manner to her native country; and a decree was put forth by the Court of Madrid commanding every Frenchman to leave Spain.It is true that, fifty years after the peace of Utrecht, an alliance of peculiar strictness was formed between the French and Spanish Governments.But both Governments were actuated on that occasion, not by domestic affection, but by common interests and common enmities.Their compact, though called the Family Compact, was as purely a political compact as the league of Cambrai or the league of Pilnitz.